Originally Posted by: Bruise Wayn 
Since when did i make any assumptions that "these" are bugs? Which are the "these" are you referring to?
If someone says this needs fixing, they are generally suggesting something is broken...bug...error...issue...I'm using these words interchangeably in this case.
Quote:
I am fully aware its a completely different car. Obviously the LM is not in the game for some reason; of which i am totally not interested to know why. if its not in the game, its not in the game, for some reason. Simple as that. Actually if you know your Mclarens, its not really that different from the road car. But nvm, you can read all about it yourself.
My point being, if the road car is in the game, and obviously the LM isn't, the least you can do is to allow a LM type wing as an option. the generic gt wing is ugly, and on something as special as a Mclaren F1 road car, its a travesty.
This has been part of all the forza games.....they include some 'generic' options that are supposed to not only provide a visual cue that the car is upgraded but also provide some form of either front-end or rear-end downforce adjustment. But they are generic, indeed.
I could say I side with you in one argument, why are "vintage" cars limited to the duck-tail spoilers and not the full-on generic rear-wing......that always bothers me when the only 'generic wing' I can choose is the short-stubby NASCAR style versus the full-on aero wing.
Quote:Now on trashing. The thrashing is more on inaccurate 3d models of the cars themselves, and what imho are ill thought out option maps for these cars. Sure you don't mind; but i do. So its obvious we all adhere to different standards.
You called them incompetent in the title of your post, that was a little harsh....incompetence implies lack of talent, we don't know why some of these situations exist, but considering how well done the rest of the game is and the amount of content available within it, I'd suggest incompetence is not at play here.....
Quote:
Personally i feel that if you are out to make a racing game, then do it properly. Not half ***. it.
Properly meaning 98% of the game is excellent and 2% can be debated based on the users preference? Some hate Horizon because it doesn't have the same physics as Motorsport, others hate it because its too hard and not arcadey-loose as say FH3 was perceived as being, I mean when we take into account the scope of the game they have delivered, varying seasons, so many cars and so forth....and how it's not selling millions of copies anymore a month, most likely, one has to also ask: Why are they even supporting it at all at this point, why not just say "ok here's our game, enjoy it, if its broke now it's going to stay broke....see you at Forza Horizon 5!" ....but they don't, they keep releasing updates. While you are of course welcome to your opinion and are a bit more of a perfectionist than I happen to be, I think in the end we can agree, hopefully, that this game is not a dumpster fire of flaws......its a very well rounded game that still has some rough edges, as all games tend to do.
Quote:
Personal opinion, i am allowed to have 1, as much as u r allowed yrs, and i respect that.
Agreed.
Edited by user Tuesday, October 20, 2020 7:04:42 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified