New thread now created.
1 Like
The problem with something like this is finding a representative track that covers as many car and available track traits as possible without becoming too long which then increases variance.
HMC isn’t that good imho because it favours acceleration by a huge margin. A lot of the top tuners have abandoned it for this reason.
Also for a stock vehicle testing some parameters have to be defined. Cars with shift time penalties have to be driven with MC for example.
Further the question if stock adjustable things like suspension, aero or brakes should be tuned. Imho yes because the stock car already paid the PI cost to have stock adjustable suspension for example.
I’ve tried a stock PI accuracy test in the past as well but it quickly turned into a documentation hell due to all the “maybe” parameters. Full-tuned testing was less effort and gave more reliable results.
But always glad to see the testing spirit here. So, big thumbs up for your ambition.
1 Like